I don’t know where to start.
The depressing commitment to further embed car reliance, high emissions and traffication?
The obvious contradiction in saying “the decision on the funding model has not been made yet, but the tunnel itself and the utility works would be publicly funded, alongside significant private sector finance”?
The MP from the car-worshipping anti-nature party being against it(!)?
The evident truth spoken by Chris Todd from TAN, that has failed to inform the decision?
Maybe I should just go back to bed.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crewy5472gxo
