An article I won't link is titled "Brain Fog Is Here to Stay"
Imagine saying since the huge increase in brain fog after 2020 includes folks with who haven't been diagnosed with Long COVID, the brain fog can't be because of previous COVID infections.
I can see the placards now: No causality without diagnosis!
The author has brain fog herself, and she's clearly in a tremendously challenging local situation as her article does communicate, so fine, but her editors still OK'ed and published an article based on a ridiculous premise.
Last year, a large study of adults in the U.K. found that 28 percent reported brain fog associated with “functional impairments,” and while it’s tempting to chalk that figure up to long COVID, the version of the disease that can last for months or years, the survey didn’t bear this out. Long COVID was just one predictor of brain fog, along with migraines, concussions, and being a middle-aged woman. So, if it isn’t only that, what is fogging up our thoughts?
There ARE other causes of brain fog. Folks with ME/CFS have heard of "fibro fog"; fighters know of "punch drunk", the list goes on. Cases from 2018 and earlier weren't Long COVID, though many cases do seem to be postviral conditions.
But this logic is awful and the fact that editors would print a piece that is completely based on a fallacy - well I guess I know not to trust The Cut as a publication.
I won't link to it, to not give false logic the traffic.