https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01051-2
https://gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#ArtificialIntelligence
There is evidence that peer reviewers are using bullshit generators (chatbots) to generate evaluations of submitted papers. Since those programs don't really understand the articles that are being reviewed, or the subject that those are about, this is asking for error. Please don't call those programs "AI"!
@rms An "AI" cannot do a peer review properly, because it can never properly be a peer! An LLM engine is an interesting database diving tool, and that is the only thing it can reliably be used for. Every other use is a mistake or a crime or both.