[1/3] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jan/09/california-fire-memory
How building houses in areas of frequent fire within LA built up the conditions for worse fires. It could be that leaving some areas vacant would help protect the rest of the city from fire. But not necessarily. The end to fire suppression in certain areas would cause more frequent fire in those areas. Those would not directly harm anyone if the areas were uninhabited - but these fires have been spread by
[2/3] burning embers which can travel a long way. It could be that the frequent fires in those areas would spread each time to inhabited parts of the city. I can see the question, but I don't know enough to propose an answer. Building all buildings so that they have nothing flammable on the outside would make them safe. Eliminating all trees would help too. Is anyone working on a fire-extinguishing robot? To have 10,000 of those in the LA area would be expensive, but it might be worth the
[3/3] cost.