NGI Zero open source funding<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.ar.al/@aral" class="u-url mention">@<span>aral</span></a></span> Please find me a technology big tech is involved with that we are not funding actual alternatives to. Any form of proprietary lock-in is something we target to remove, anything that invades privacy needs to be stopped/mitigated (think <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/NoScript" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>NoScript</span></a>, <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/JShelter" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>JShelter</span></a>, <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/Offen" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Offen</span></a>.dev, <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/Goatcounter" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Goatcounter</span></a>, <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/TrackingTheTrackers" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>TrackingTheTrackers</span></a>, <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/Searx" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Searx</span></a>, <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/Qubes" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Qubes</span></a>, <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/SpectrumOS" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>SpectrumOS</span></a>, etc). That is our contribution. Obviously, the trillion dollar surveillance economy needs to be curbed by harsh regulation, but this is not within our remit...</p>