mastodon.xyz is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance, open to everyone, but mainly English and French speaking.

Administered by:

Server stats:

745
active users

#softwaredevelopment

26 posts24 participants0 posts today

Question for any software developers who use AI code generation tools (Cursor, Github Copilot etc). I know that some devs like it, while some find it irritating. That's fine.

However, I'm curious: what - if any - rules has your organisation put around the usage of these tools - more testing, stricter code reviews, more documentation? Something else? Nothing at all (since ultimately the developer is responsible)?

The biggest bottlenecks in the software lifecycle have nothing to do with code. They’re people problems: communication, persuasion, decision-making.

How do you reliably get the right people in the right place, at the right time, talking about the right things? Is there a transfer protocol or infrastructure-as-code tool that works on human beings?

As it happens, yes.

My latest byline:

🔗 stackoverflow.blog/2025/08/20/

stackoverflow.blogDocuments: The architect’s programming language - Stack Overflow

"API documentation writers don’t just write content. We’re liaisons between client developers and in-house developers. I often say “we’re paid by the company but work for our clients.” Many think that in-house developers automatically empathize with the client developers. After all, they’re all developers, right? Right? Well, no. A surprising number of times, in-house developers are actually out of touch with clients. Why else would we be talking about having clear field names? They get tunnel vision or become myopic while in the code. This is not unique to developers. All professions have this risk. That’s our job to make sure that clarity is there for the clients. We can’t do it completely by ourselves. We need developer’s buy in. That means, one of two things.

We can push back on the in-house developers. When we see a meaningless, poor, or bad field names, for example, we have the right, if not obligation, to get it changed. Some developers may disagree. That’s OK. The truth is, the code doesn’t belong exclusively to in-house developers. It’s the client’s code. They’re the ones intended to run the code, to know which fields to pass in, with which values, and to read the response JSON. That makes it our code, too. We not only have to run the code but also to explain this to clients. We have a say in the matter."

robertdelwood.medium.com/writi

Medium · Writing for Humans: An API Documentation Writer WritesBy Robert Delwood, A Lead API Documentation Writer

hey community! this looks amazing!

FITS 2025
Feminist IT 2 the Sky

A whole day of feminist engagement with diverse IT topics, for FLINTA* folks, taking place at the TU Wien, on Saturday 27th September 2025.

The registration form will be linked here fits.diebin.at/ some time in the second half of August.

#wien #flinta* #IT #Coding #SoftwareDevelopment #Linux & #OpenSource #EthicalHacking

congrats to @diebin
Edit: praises to @jackie and others around the feminist linux meetup vienna!

The feminist technoscience logo
fits.diebin.atFITS 2025 - Feminist IT 2 the Sky!A whole day of feminist engagement with some IT topics, for women and non-binary folks, taking place at the TU Wien, on Saturday 27th September 2025.
Continued thread