mastodon.xyz is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance, open to everyone, but mainly English and French speaking.

Administered by:

Server stats:

833
active users

#metaphysics

2 posts2 participants1 post today
Continued thread

My North American tour is just about over, and it’s gone better than I could have hoped, with excellent discussions with colleagues at Chapman, UC Berkeley, UC Davis and Calgary, and really helpful questions and feedback at each of my talks.

My last talk of this trip will be this afternoon, at the CUNY Graduate Center, for the Logic and Metaphysics Workshop.

consequently.org/presentation/

consequently.orgModal Logic and Contingent Existence — consequently.org
Continued thread

@bookstodon

Celebrating the Centenary of A VOYAGE TO ARCTURUS

From 2020: a conversation between Lindsay specialist Douglas A. Anderson, Prof Robert A. Davisl, & author Nina Allan, discussing the novel & its influence on fantasy writers – hosted by the Unversity of Glasgow’s Centre for Fantasy & the Fantastic

4/4

youtube.com/watch?v=A6HpKWSLuB

www.youtube.com- YouTubeEnjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

🔴 📖 **The Problems of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell**

_"In this work, Russell explores fundamental questions regarding the nature of knowledge, reality, and existence, interrogating what we can genuinely know about the world around us."_

🔗 gutenberg.org/ebooks/5827

#BertrandRussell #ProjectGutenberg #Read #Download #Free #EBook #Book #Bookstodon #Philosophy #Metaphysics @bookstodon @philosophy

Project GutenbergThe Problems of Philosophy by Bertrand RussellFree kindle book and epub digitized and proofread by volunteers.

Next week, I’m heading off to North America for a few talks. (I’d committed to these talks before last year’s election and I have mixed feelings about the trip, but I’m going, nonetheless.)

If you're in the LA area, in or around Calgary, or New York, and you’re into philosophical logic, why not drop by? Details of the talks are here consequently.org/presentation/

consequently.orgPresentations — consequently.org

Coming up soon! (as in today!!!!)

Book Launch for Solving Name: Worldliness and #Metaphysics in #Librarianship

Registration: libraryjuice.zoom.us/webinar/r

“Solving Names” for American pragmatist #philosopher William James meant that no further debate or enquiry was needed. In #Librarianship this means the construction, maintenance, and reproduction of #racial, #settler- #colonial, #patriarchal #capitalism.

Reading Victor Lowe "Understanding Whitehead" on "organism" some pieces fall into place.

Since we're humans, not machines, thinking about the foundation of epistemology may take von Uexküll's umwelt-innenwelt dialectic as a functional point of view.

As lebewesen we can't do anything against the systemic relation, the analogy, between prehension and metaphysics. This is our grounding.

Continued thread

[3/4]

What's so "expansive" about the atheism that appears in the argument from freedom?

The argument from freedom starts with the atheistic belief that there is no Creator; but also... there are no truly fundamental laws of physics; no external influencers on the universe; no external sources; no external causes. Nothing is "outside of" or "prior to" to reality. There are no brute facts imposed upon reality, as if from the outside.

Why? Well - atheism is just a belief - I don't have an argument for it. But I can share that do not believe it makes any sense for reality to be subject to constraints because, to me, it is a sort of anthropomorphization: we are highly constrained creatures, and we misapply our experience to what we imagine reality to be like.

I call all these things (Gods, Laws, Brute Facts, etc.) "constraints" - and I don't believe reality as a whole can be constrained.

Continued thread

[2/4]

In the *argument from freedom*, one starts with an expansive form of atheism, and... what sort of philosophy is this? It lives in the same space as atheism: it is a completely different sort of philosophy depending on whether or not it's correct. On the one hand, if it's true, the whole argument is about human ideas and which ones are wrong. But if it's false, it is an incorrect argument about reality itself.

But hold on...