I am “#sourceforge was actually a usable site where a lot of great software development happened” years old and I have ugly deja vus regarding the #GitHub situation.
I am “#sourceforge was actually a usable site where a lot of great software development happened” years old and I have ugly deja vus regarding the #GitHub situation.
@nixCraft I remember #SourceForge. One day, it randomly started to force ad-infested "installers" into every software download which probably marked the beginning of its downfall.
And yes, independent FOSS infrastructure is important.
I think #Codeberg/#Forgejo is doing a great job in providing a non-commercial, free-software, no-bullshit software forge. Free software development needs free software tools. It BAFFLES me how this isn’t consensus in the #FOSS community.
On the subject of the ongoing enshittification of GritHub, we've been here before. From a post on my #Disintermedia blog in its early days;
"SF.net has since reimplemented its stack in Python, beginning in 2009 as a new free code project called Allura under the Apache 2.0 license, and in June 2011, a piece was posted on the SourceForge blog which finished off, 'pull up a chair, because we’re here to stay'."
(1/2)
quand est-ce qu’on éteint SourceForge pour de bon ?
11 downloads in the first 24 hours, and I only posted on Mastodon and LinkedIn, where I am not so popular!
Thank you all for the interest in BashCoreX.
It means a lot, and it's just the beginning.
More updates, tests and fun ahead!
Dear #SourceForge … please check your #JavaScript actually works before falsely accusing a user for not having it enabled.
```
Uncaught TypeError: this.countryGroups.GDPR is undefined
requireNonEssentialProfileFields https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:6
requireNonEssentialProfileFields https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:6
countrySelected https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:6
dispatch https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:2
handle https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:2
trigger https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:2
trigger https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:2
each https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:2
each https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:2
trigger https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-head.js?1745245685:2
<anonymous> https://a.fsdn.com/con/js/min/sf.sandiego-base.js?1745245685:15
```
#OnThisDay, 2006-04-01, #MediaWiki development moved from a #SourceForge hosted #CVS environment to #SVN after a extended outage of the SourceForge CVS service.
The original SVN environment was hosted on @brooke's server until migrating to a @wikimediafoundation server on the 2007-05-31.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/History_of_MediaWiki_version_control
Does #gnuplot project <http://www.gnuplot.info/> not believe in providing SHA(512|256) checksums of download files? Or, PGP/GPG signature of the file (along with public key)?
The downloading behaviour on #SourceForge <https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuplot/files/gnuplot/5.4.10/> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuplot/files/gnuplot/5.4.10/gnuplot-5.4.10.tar.gz/download> in itself creeps me out for having a fucking redirection. Why.
And I just realized that the project website itself uses "HTTP" without the "S". Yeah
I would not have to look into installing v5.4.10 on someone's request if it was available as a package for #RockLinux 8 that work has in use.
It has not moved to v9+ due to lack of support for NIS; moving to LDAP is planned in 1+ years.
@aalmiray Oh, hard to say... I think, convincing someone to release a software under #GPL also counts? That was 2001. https://openhub.net/p/40054/contributors/172032767652987. Not sure if I have done something earlier. #sourceforge doesn't allow me to log in.
I just published "The Rise, Fall and Resurgence of SourceForge: What Happened to the Open Source Pioneer?". I hope you find it interesting.
How to Create Deb Package Repository at #Sourceforge
https://www.tecmint.com/create-deb-package-repository-at-sourceforge/
I need an alternative to #SourceForge that isn't #Github, or #Gitlab.
Si gestionas tus proyectos con #git, los puedes almacenar en #GitHub, #GitLab, #SourceForge...
#launchpad is almost as bad as #sourceforge UI/UX wise.
I contributed to a project using #SourceForge and while a blast from the past it was... surprisingly not terrible?
Still preferring @Codeberg though :)
@mih
The only two variants I know of that aren't #github style (some modicum of centralized forges) are email conversations (like #sourceforge promotes) and #radicle.
Not sure how #ConventionalCommits answer your request, but perhaps I misunderstand what you're looking for. Care to expand on that?
@deflarerOfClouds #GitHub has hosted #PerlTidy development for a long time. Please continue to file bug reports there: https://GitHub.com/perltidy/perltidy/issues
You might even consider making a reasonable case to move the project’s remaining assets off #SourceForge. Impotently whinging about it here doesn’t change anything.
@mjgardner @Perl @ChristosArgyrop @ovid Certainly it’s an embarrassment considering #Sourceforge has recently joined the exclusive walled-garden of #Cloudflare. I cannot reach any sourceforge.net/* pages. But I can reach perltidy.sourceforge.net because it’s CF with Tor whitelisted. However, I’ll still avoid it on principle. I don’t think I’ve filed bug reports there but certainly I will not in the future.
[2208.04259] First Come First Served: The Impact of File Position on #CodeReview
https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.04259