The Federal Circuit has reversed ND Cal on Oracle v. Google, finding that Android's use of Java APIs was not a fair use. If anybody has any questions about the opinion or the case I'm happy to answer them.
What about OpenJDK? Is that affected?
@veryonline OpenJDK is AFAIK mostly not affected, as it's "official". (Other licensed projects will also not be affected)
Does this mean Google has to buy Oracle?
@veryonline the next step is remand back to the (same) district court, which will now determine damages.
@xor is this possibly relevant enough to other API after the case was (formerly) settled that the computing world is going to have a terrifying legal Mexican standoff as they figure out who pays who what?
@Ashrand this case is certainly being closely monitored, and earlier rounds of litigation have led to follow-up suits. One prominent example is Cisco v. Arista, which is now in front of the same Court of Appeals https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2018/01/cisco-v-arista
1) Does this mean that anyone implementing an API-compatible replacement for a library needs to license the API from the original library author?
2) Are there any sort of BSD/GPL-like "API licenses" that companies can use to authorize reimplementation of their API without open-sourcing their entire project?
@lm 1) I would say you'll see a lot of developers and companies spooked and looking for licenses where they hadn't needed to before.
2) this is a good question and I don't know the answer. There hasn't really been demand for such a license previously, as this was considered (properly so, imo) to be uncopyrightable material.
@xor Agreed that this shouldn't be a copyright issue in the first place...
I suppose the best way to limit damages here is to campaign for companies to permissively license their APIs?
Oh, 3) does this mean we get more judge alsup stories
@lm you'll have to ask sarah on that one
@xor yes, I have a question, where is the teespring for "you wouldn't reimplement an API"
@xor :| what the henck
@xor Just confirming my understanding of what you said: So the new ruling is that Google IS beholden in some way to Oracle after all?
@benhamill yes, Google infringed Oracle's Java copyright. It's now being sent back down to Alsup to do a damages trial (or will be appealed to SCOTUS)
Generalistic and moderated instance. All opinions are welcome, but hate speeches are prohibited. Users who don't respect rules will be silenced or suspended, depending on the violation severity.