The for that have been started, but need help to really get going right now are:

(),

(),

(),

()

(),

()

If you like helping out with projects, have some time and (obviously) speak the , chip in a sentence, or two:

crowdin.com/project/plume

It's appreciated, and helpful to the diverse community here on the , so thank you.

Great work done for DE, ES, IT, JP already...

The ‘problem of the inadequacy of 's that there're more phenomena in the world, then there are words for them…we must use language in a different way to capture the experience of things, about the impression they make, rather then about the things themselves. That is roughly the difference between actual truth of our insight, and our memory of it, which's why striving for a different view of a problem one has already resolved can lead to a better formulation, a capture of the problem.

Helping to understand just what the whole reasoned behind immersing references & allusions in a very subjectively involved text're stirring, point to.

Shortcomings're not if true or what they mean, but how to parse them, how to follow the writer's argument along a path, what's the framing scope, or where the intended exponence reaches. To look at proposals in bare bones with a genuine interest, mental acumen of getting together the best theory.

Mastodon

Generalistic and moderated instance. All opinions are welcome, but hate speeches are prohibited. Users who don't respect rules will be silenced or suspended, depending on the violation severity.