Paraphrasing, but this is what I just heard in a meeting, from the same person:
"We can't use open source because it's too much work."
"We cobbled together a bunch of proprietary services to create a complete workflow, but those tools weren't working, so we're switching to a monolithic proprietary service that doesn't provide the same functions, and we'll cobble other proprietary services on top of it to round it out."
@firstname.lastname@example.org So, what I'm hearing is that it is in the company's financial interest to either fire this person or remove them from decision making positions.
@klaatu but does your proposed open source solution have the essential "blame the vendor for my shortcomings" feature that the proprietary solution can offer?
@rafial I thought the old reliable "<heaving sigh> open source — you get what you pay for" clause would be enough, but you're right, I failed to include the explicit blame package. Well, maybe next time!
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!