Hello! I really like my feed: I learn lots of new things about #infosec, #crypto, #coops and #opensource.
However I'm missing some things--can you help me find them?
I want to talk more about people, working with them, their limitations and potential. I want to talk about #governance, #facilitation, #voting, #cognitivebiases and other concrete things that can be tried (and falsified) in #groups.
Let me know if you're interested, or boost if you think you have followers who are interested.
😀
@douginamug
even so we talked about some of those subjects earlier, and we might know to some extend the points of the other, ain't they static and will also develope through critical discourse.
So yes, they are definatly in my interest.
wanna take a current event as a basis to let different topics emerge?
and this article in specifc as a starting point?
https://crimethinc.com/2018/04/23/one-but-many-movements-two-translations-from-the-zad-on-isolation-division-and-pacification
@paulfree14 Thanks, I read 'Revenge against the Commons' yesterday https://zadforever.blog/2018/04/24/the-revenge-against-the-commons/ also covering la #ZAD
Once physical violence is involved in a group, a whole other way of behaving is required. I am interested in that to a degree: we do selbstverteidigun at the Judo club I go to. Have you been to la ZAD yet?
@douginamug
...
''Is unity necessarily the best way for a movement to build strength? Or is it better to foster an irreducible diversity of approaches, so that negotiation will be, if not impossible, at least—useless?
@paulfree14 Ah thanks, I will read through it then :)
@douginamug
haven't read that one.
this one is more about 'conflicts within social movements'
That's why I thought it would be of interest:
- 'bitter differences about how to deal with power dynamics'
- 'how to resist the divide-and-conquer tactics'
- 'come out of each conflict stronger and more capable of evaluating our effectiveness'
- 'justify negotiating... to maintain the unity of the movement'
...