Follow

We've been asked if we could quickly implement new features in so that it could replace , which has been doing shady things. We can't and we don't want to. Encouraging people to pay for a specific issue to be solved is problematic, it creates bad incentives instead of providing stable funding for the proper maintenance and development of a project. If you still think bounties are a good idea, then you can try to revive freedomsponsors.org/

@Liberapay
Maybe Issue bounties make more sense when they are set by the developers on issues they need additional help with?

@jambamkin I agree. For Snikket, we've discussed soliciting donations for specific pieces of work, so donors don't feel like they're throwing coins in a wishing well. For example, there's no reason for iThing users to donate to a project that only has an Android app. But if they could donate specifically for the dev work on the iThing app...

@Liberapay

@mmu_man We know, our message is mostly to remind everyone why Liberapay doesn't provide a bounty system.

You can find a few more details about the aborted Bountysource ToS change on GitHub: github.com/bountysource/core/p

@Liberapay
@elementary Hey, check out freedomsponsors.org

@Liberapay
> If you still think bounties are a good idea ...

You could try #GitPay?
gitpay.me/

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!