Wack Playstation Sup! ๐Ÿ™Š ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ is a user on mastodon.xyz. You can follow them or interact with them if you have an account anywhere in the fediverse. If you don't, you can sign up here.

You know instance admins can read your direct messages in the fediverse? Twitter and Facebook also can - and sometimes do - read your private messages, and they have infrastructure to comply with law enforcement requests. I'd love to see some end-to-end encryption built into Mastodon clients.

@lambadalambda @micahflee the solution here is not to use a different tool, but to fix the tool we're using. There is no reason why #Mastodon couldn't support #e2e #encryption in private messages.

@lambadalambda @micahflee but that's the tool people are using. I use XMPP+OTR, e-mail+PGP, Signal, etc., but if somebody is not as tech-savvy but is already here, I don't see why they should not have the option of encrypting private messages.

Or, put a bit differently: mastodon.social/media/N9MHhHNB

@lambadalambda @micahflee Yes, that is a concern. Still better than nothing though.

Also, you're completely ignoring apps. If #Mastodon has official and standardized support for #e2e #encryption, apps can implement it, closing the JS loophole.

@rysiek @lambadalambda @micahflee I think adding an integrated XMPP+OMEMO server and client in Mastodon is a good idea. I think creating something homebrew is a bad idea.
Wack Playstation Sup! ๐Ÿ™Š ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ @HerraBRE

@pettter @rysiek @micahflee FWIW, I agree with @lambadalambda - it can be argued that private messages are simply a misfeature in OStatus since they cannot be truly private without extra (non-standard) hacks.

Keeping things simple is valuable; using the right tool for the job (some other protocol for private messages) is good engineering.

ยท Web ยท 1 ยท 5

@lieselotte @pettter @rysiek @micahflee @lambadalambda Well, I'd venture that poor engineering usually leads to a poor user experience sooner or later. The fundamental user expectation is "software that works".

Mastodon and GNU Social and others could all agree to integrate XMPP (or even SMTP) for direct messages. It doesn't need to be in the OStatus protocol.

@HerraBRE @micahflee @rysiek @pettter Note that having private messages work cleanly (and no different than public posts) is one of the things ActivityPub was designed for. The design is much closer to email delivery... outbox -> inbox, w/ to, cc, bcc addressing.

@cwebber If you don't mind my picking your brain a bit, how exactly do these work? ย I have familiarity with OStatus obviously, but less so with ActivityPub and I'm interested in picking it up so we can communicate with AP using software.

@maiyannah Sure, happy to go through it. Spec is here: w3.org/TR/activitypub/ but tl;dr: your user has an inbox & outbox, you post json messages to your outbox and your server looks at recipients and sends to their inboxes. That's most of the whole spec right there. Simple stuff.

@cwebber @micahflee @rysiek @pettter I think some of us feel that creating new "private messaging" channels that lack e2e crypto is really not something we should be doing anymore.