Although I love and appreciate my friends who fight in the political sphere...
Part of me thinks a) we can't win and b) the censorship, the filtering, the copyright, the moral panics - all will ultimately work to our favour.
By "our", I mean us folks who care about decentralization, free software and less corporate ways to exist online.
The more constraints the law puts on Internet businesses, the more compelling the law-ignoring DIY alternatives become.
Bad laws are for breaking. ✊
If you want to compete with Google or Facebook or other big companies, you need to understand that a) they are actually constrained by the law and b) the only computer bigger than their computer, is "everybody else's computer."
Radical decentralization + build software that has features the companies cannot offer for legal reasons.
We just have to be willing to go where the big companies can't. The more censorship there is of "normal" content, the more opportunities there are to do just that.
I'm much more concerned with "the state"(©) (three-letter-agencies) than big companies, therefore I completely disagree with you, because the law obviously works in the states' favor
@Maltimore I don't think we are in conflict.
If systems are built that allow users to relatively safely flout copyright law (for example), it will accidentally also raise the bar and provide cover for other types of non-state-sanctioned comms, including organized resistance.
And it will either thwart or raise significantly the cost of mass surveillance.
Elsewhere in the thread I said I would never object to or try to discourage people from fighting bad laws.
Just pondering a silver lining.
Generalistic and moderated instance. All opinions are welcome, but hate speeches are prohibited. Users who don't respect rules will be silenced or suspended, depending on the violation severity.