@HerraBRE I absolutely agree about protecting crypto, but I don't agree about not fighting the political fight. We should build tech that's as immune to bad laws as possible under the veil of crypto, but that's only so possible. These aren't mutually exclusive... fighting bad laws / fighting for good ones should happen in tandem with building good tech.
@cwebber I would never actually go so far as to discourage people from fighting these legal battles. What if I'm wrong?
I'm just pointing out a silver lining that has a strategic element to it.
If we want to effectively fight the big companies, we need to understand their weaknesses and where we are stronger.
If you want to compete with Google or Facebook or other big companies, you need to understand that a) they are actually constrained by the law and b) the only computer bigger than their computer, is "everybody else's computer."
Radical decentralization + build software that has features the companies cannot offer for legal reasons.
We just have to be willing to go where the big companies can't. The more censorship there is of "normal" content, the more opportunities there are to do just that.
@Maltimore I don't think we are in conflict.
If systems are built that allow users to relatively safely flout copyright law (for example), it will accidentally also raise the bar and provide cover for other types of non-state-sanctioned comms, including organized resistance.
And it will either thwart or raise significantly the cost of mass surveillance.
Elsewhere in the thread I said I would never object to or try to discourage people from fighting bad laws.
Just pondering a silver lining.
Generalistic and moderated instance. All opinions are welcome, but hate speeches are prohibited. Users who don't respect rules will be silenced or suspended, depending on the violation severity.